Sign in
☰
People MPsHouse of LordsGovernmentOppositionPartiesCommittees Votes Commons votesLords votesVotes by issueTopicsStats & rankingsParliament in numbers Legislation BillsEarly day motionsPetitions Elections Election resultsConstituenciesWho is my MP? Scotland OverviewMSPsScottish GovernmentVotesBillsMotionsCommitteesConstituencies & regionsElections Search Sign in

Lords division · 3 Feb 2010 · No. 1

Digital Economy Bill [HL]

Lord Howard of Rising moved amendment 226A, in clause 19, page 21, line 11, at end to insert: “( ) An order under section 124O must make provision about the steps that the Secretary of State considers appropriate for remedying the failure and any consequences of the failure.” The Committee divided:

The Not Contents have it

Majority 67

Contents: 79 Not Contents: 146

At a glance The Not Contents won by a margin of 67 votes. The Government's position was Not Content, and it won.

How the parties voted

Contents

Conservative 72
Crossbench 6
Non-affiliated 1

Not Contents

Labour 97
Crossbench 33
Non-affiliated 10
Liberal Democrat 2
Ulster Unionist Party 1
Democratic Unionist Party 1
Independent Labour 1
Bishops 1

The party breakdowns are our own analysis of the official voting records (recorded votes only; they do not describe the formal whip). How we work this out.

Peers attend divisions ad hoc, so there is no did-not-vote list. Tellers are counted in the Content and Not Content totals, unlike in the Commons.

Tellers: Baroness Anelay of St Johns (Content), Baroness Seccombe (Content), Lord Bassam of Brighton (Not Content), Lord Davies of Oldham (Not Content).

Every vote

Contents (77)

Not Contents (144)

Tellers (4)

Source: the official Lords division record.