Sign in
☰
People MPsHouse of LordsGovernmentOppositionPartiesCommittees Votes Commons votesLords votesVotes by issueTopicsStats & rankingsParliament in numbers Legislation BillsEarly day motionsPetitions Elections Election resultsConstituenciesWho is my MP? Scotland OverviewMSPsScottish GovernmentVotesBillsMotionsCommitteesConstituencies & regionsElections Search Sign in

Lords division · 8 Feb 2001 · No. 1

Local Authorities (Executive Arrangements) (Access to Information) (England) Regulations 2000

It was moved by the Lord Dixon-Smith, That an Humble Address be presented to Her Majesty praying that the Regulations, laid before the House on 19th December 2000, be annulled (S.I. 2000/3272); which being objected to, the question was put thereupon, and the House divided:

The Not Contents have it

Majority 53

Contents: 63 Not Contents: 116

At a glance The Not Contents won by a margin of 53 votes. The Government's position was Not Content, and it won.

How the parties voted

Contents

Conservative 57
Non-affiliated 4
Crossbench 2

Not Contents

Labour 79
Liberal Democrat 24
Non-affiliated 7
Crossbench 6

The party breakdowns are our own analysis of the official voting records (recorded votes only; they do not describe the formal whip). How we work this out.

Peers attend divisions ad hoc, so there is no did-not-vote list. Tellers are counted in the Content and Not Content totals, unlike in the Commons.

Tellers: Lord Burnham (Content), Lord Henley (Content), Lord Carter (Not Content), The Lord McIntosh of Haringey (Not Content).

Every vote

Contents (61)

Not Contents (114)

Tellers (4)

Source: the official Lords division record.