Sign in
☰
People MPsHouse of LordsGovernmentOppositionPartiesCommittees Votes Commons votesLords votesVotes by issueTopicsStats & rankingsParliament in numbers Legislation BillsEarly day motionsPetitions Elections Election resultsConstituenciesWho is my MP? Scotland OverviewMSPsScottish GovernmentVotesBillsMotionsCommitteesConstituencies & regionsElections Search Sign in

Lords division · 20 Feb 2001 · No. 4

Special Educational Needs and Disibility Bill [HL]

It was moved by the Baroness Blatch, in Clause 2, page 3, line 42, to leave out (“proprietors”) and insert (“governing bodies”); which being objected to, the question was put thereupon, and the House divided:

The Not Contents have it

Majority 64

Contents: 31 Not Contents: 95

At a glance The Not Contents won by a margin of 64 votes. The Government's position was Not Content, and it won.

How the parties voted

Contents

Conservative 29
Crossbench 1
Non-affiliated 1

Not Contents

Labour 65
Liberal Democrat 18
Non-affiliated 7
Crossbench 5

The party breakdowns are our own analysis of the official voting records (recorded votes only; they do not describe the formal whip). How we work this out.

Peers attend divisions ad hoc, so there is no did-not-vote list. Tellers are counted in the Content and Not Content totals, unlike in the Commons.

Tellers: Lord Burnham (Content), Lord Henley (Content), Baroness Andrews (Not Content), Lord Carter (Not Content).

Every vote

Contents (29)

Not Contents (93)

Tellers (4)

Source: the official Lords division record.