Lords division · 13 Nov 2001 · No. 1

Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Bill [HL]

It was moved by the Lord Kingsland in Clause 123, page 62, line 9, to leave out from “payable),” to end of line 10 and insert “in paragraph 1(1), for the definition of “the valuation date” substitute— ““the valuation date” means the date of service of the reversioner’s counter—notice.”” which being objected to, the question was put thereupon, and the House divided:

The Not Contents have it

Majority 71

Contents: 52 Not Contents: 123

At a glance The Not Contents won by a margin of 71 votes. The Government's position was Not Content, and it won.

How the parties voted

Contents

Conservative 50
Crossbench 1
Non-affiliated 1

Not Contents

Labour 92
Liberal Democrat 17
Crossbench 9
Non-affiliated 4
Bishops 1

The party breakdowns are our own analysis of the official voting records (recorded votes only; they do not describe the formal whip). How we work this out.

Peers attend divisions ad hoc, so there is no did-not-vote list. Tellers are counted in the Content and Not Content totals, unlike in the Commons.

Tellers: Lord Cope of Berkeley (Content), Baroness Seccombe (Content), Lord Carter (Not Content), The Lord McIntosh of Haringey (Not Content).

Every vote

Contents (50)

Not Contents (121)

Tellers (4)

Source: the official Lords division record.