Sign in
☰
People MPsHouse of LordsGovernmentOppositionPartiesCommittees Votes Commons votesLords votesVotes by issueTopicsStats & rankingsParliament in numbers Legislation BillsEarly day motionsPetitions Elections Election resultsConstituenciesWho is my MP? Scotland OverviewMSPsScottish GovernmentVotesBillsMotionsCommitteesConstituencies & regionsElections Search Sign in

Lords division · 22 Apr 2002 · No. 1

Proceeds of Crime Bill

It was moved by the Lord Kingsland, in Clause 8, page 4, line 16, at end to insert: “( ) But the defendant shall not be held to have benefited to the extent that such benefit has already been forfeited by reason of any other power or enactment.”; which being objected to, the question was put thereupon, and the Committee divided:

The Not Contents have it

Majority 44

Contents: 64 Not Contents: 108

At a glance The Not Contents won by a margin of 44 votes. The Government's position was Not Content, and it won.

How the parties voted

Contents

Conservative 52
Crossbench 9
Non-affiliated 3

Not Contents

Labour 90
Crossbench 12
Non-affiliated 6

The party breakdowns are our own analysis of the official voting records (recorded votes only; they do not describe the formal whip). How we work this out.

Peers attend divisions ad hoc, so there is no did-not-vote list. Tellers are counted in the Content and Not Content totals, unlike in the Commons.

Tellers: Lord Cope of Berkeley (Content), Baroness Seccombe (Content), Lord Carter (Not Content), The Lord McIntosh of Haringey (Not Content).

Every vote

Contents (62)

Not Contents (106)

Tellers (4)

Source: the official Lords division record.