Sign in
☰
People MPsHouse of LordsGovernmentOppositionPartiesCommittees Votes Commons votesLords votesVotes by issueTopicsStats & rankingsParliament in numbers Legislation BillsEarly day motionsPetitions Elections Election resultsConstituenciesWho is my MP? Scotland OverviewMSPsScottish GovernmentVotesBillsMotionsCommitteesConstituencies & regionsElections Search Sign in

Lords division · 25 Jun 2002 · No. 3

Proceeds of Crime Bill

It was moved by the Lord Goodhart, in Clause 75, page 48, line 18, after “concerned” to insert “is an offence punishable by imprisonment and”; which being objected to, the question was put thereupon, and the House divided:

The Not Contents have it

Majority 8

Contents: 114 Not Contents: 122

At a glance The Not Contents won by a margin of 8 votes. The Government's position was Not Content, and it won.

How the parties voted

Contents

Conservative 69
Liberal Democrat 27
Crossbench 8
Non-affiliated 7
Ulster Unionist Party 1
Green Party 1
Lord Speaker 1

Not Contents

Labour 106
Non-affiliated 9
Crossbench 7

The party breakdowns are our own analysis of the official voting records (recorded votes only; they do not describe the formal whip). How we work this out.

Peers attend divisions ad hoc, so there is no did-not-vote list. Tellers are counted in the Content and Not Content totals, unlike in the Commons.

Tellers: Baroness Seccombe (Content), Lord Goodhart (Content), Lord Grocott (Not Content), The Lord McIntosh of Haringey (Not Content).

Every vote

Contents (112)

Not Contents (120)

Tellers (4)

Source: the official Lords division record.