Sign in
☰
People MPsHouse of LordsGovernmentOppositionPartiesCommittees Votes Commons votesLords votesVotes by issueTopicsStats & rankingsParliament in numbers Legislation BillsEarly day motionsPetitions Elections Election resultsConstituenciesWho is my MP? Scotland OverviewMSPsScottish GovernmentVotesBillsMotionsCommitteesConstituencies & regionsElections Search Sign in

Lords division · 13 Dec 2001 · No. 5

Anti-terrorism, Crime and Security Bill

It was moved by the Baroness Williams of Crosby, as an amendment to the motion that the House do not insist on its Amendment 66 and do agree to amendment 66F in lieu thereof, to disagree with Amendment 66F and agree to Amendment 66G in lieu thereof; which being objected to, the question was put thereupon, and the House divided:

The Not Contents have it

Majority 87

Contents: 48 Not Contents: 135

At a glance The Not Contents won by a margin of 87 votes. The Government's position was Not Content, and it won.

How the parties voted

Contents

Liberal Democrat 39
Non-affiliated 4
Crossbench 4
Conservative 1

Not Contents

Labour 83
Conservative 34
Crossbench 11
Non-affiliated 7

The party breakdowns are our own analysis of the official voting records (recorded votes only; they do not describe the formal whip). How we work this out.

Peers attend divisions ad hoc, so there is no did-not-vote list. Tellers are counted in the Content and Not Content totals, unlike in the Commons.

Tellers: Baroness Harris of Richmond (Content), Lord Roper (Content), Lord Cope of Berkeley (Not Content), Lord Carter (Not Content).

Every vote

Contents (46)

Not Contents (133)

Tellers (4)

Source: the official Lords division record.