Sign in
☰
People MPsHouse of LordsGovernmentOppositionPartiesCommittees Votes Commons votesLords votesVotes by issueTopicsStats & rankingsParliament in numbers Legislation BillsEarly day motionsPetitions Elections Election resultsConstituenciesWho is my MP? Scotland OverviewMSPsScottish GovernmentVotesBillsMotionsCommitteesConstituencies & regionsElections Search Sign in

Lords division · 22 Jul 2002 · No. 1

Proceeds of Crime Bill

It was moved by the Lord Goldsmith that this House do not insist on its amendment 110 to which the Commons have disagreed for their reason 110A but do propose amendment 110B in lieu thereof; which being objected to, the question was put thereupon, and the House divided:

The Contents have it

Majority 82

Contents: 126 Not Contents: 44

At a glance The Contents won by a margin of 82 votes. The Government's position was Content, and it won.

How the parties voted

Contents

Labour 111
Non-affiliated 8
Crossbench 5
Independent Socialist 1
Bishops 1

Not Contents

Conservative 26
Crossbench 14
Liberal Democrat 2
Ulster Unionist Party 1
Independent Labour 1

The party breakdowns are our own analysis of the official voting records (recorded votes only; they do not describe the formal whip). How we work this out.

Peers attend divisions ad hoc, so there is no did-not-vote list. Tellers are counted in the Content and Not Content totals, unlike in the Commons.

Tellers: Lord Grocott (Content), The Lord McIntosh of Haringey (Content), Lord Peyton of Yeovil (Not Content), Lord Lloyd of Berwick (Not Content).

Every vote

Contents (124)

Not Contents (42)

Tellers (4)

Source: the official Lords division record.