Sign in
☰
People MPsHouse of LordsGovernmentOppositionPartiesCommittees Votes Commons votesLords votesVotes by issueTopicsStats & rankingsParliament in numbers Legislation BillsEarly day motionsPetitions Elections Election resultsConstituenciesWho is my MP? Scotland OverviewMSPsScottish GovernmentVotesBillsMotionsCommitteesConstituencies & regionsElections Search Sign in

Lords division · 27 Jan 2003 · No. 1

Education Act 2002 (Modification of Provisions) (No. 2) (England) Regulations 2002

It was moved by the Baroness Blatch that an Humble Address be presented to Her Majesty praying that the Regulations, laid before the House on 2nd December 2002, be annulled (S.I. 2002/2953); which being objected to, the question was put thereupon, and the House divided:

The Not Contents have it

Majority 60

Contents: 70 Not Contents: 130

At a glance The Not Contents won by a margin of 60 votes. The Government's position was Not Content, and it won.

How the parties voted

Contents

Conservative 63
Crossbench 4
Non-affiliated 3

Not Contents

Labour 108
Liberal Democrat 9
Non-affiliated 7
Crossbench 6

The party breakdowns are our own analysis of the official voting records (recorded votes only; they do not describe the formal whip). How we work this out.

Peers attend divisions ad hoc, so there is no did-not-vote list. Tellers are counted in the Content and Not Content totals, unlike in the Commons.

Tellers: Lord Cope of Berkeley (Content), Baroness Seccombe (Content), Lord Grocott (Not Content), The Lord McIntosh of Haringey (Not Content).

Every vote

Contents (68)

Not Contents (128)

Tellers (4)

Source: the official Lords division record.