Sign in
☰
People MPsHouse of LordsGovernmentOppositionPartiesCommittees Votes Commons votesLords votesVotes by issueTopicsStats & rankingsParliament in numbers Legislation BillsEarly day motionsPetitions Elections Election resultsConstituenciesWho is my MP? Scotland OverviewMSPsScottish GovernmentVotesBillsMotionsCommitteesConstituencies & regionsElections Search Sign in

Lords division · 18 Feb 2003 · No. 2

Courts Bill [HL]

It was moved by the Lord Hunt of Wirral, before Clause 81, to insert the new Clause (Court of Appeal: Attorney General’s power to refer unduly lenient sentences); which being objected to, the question was put thereupon, and the Committee divided:

The Not Contents have it

Majority 30

Contents: 38 Not Contents: 68

At a glance The Not Contents won by a margin of 30 votes. The Government's position was Not Content, and it won.

How the parties voted

Contents

Conservative 34
Crossbench 2
Non-affiliated 2

Not Contents

Labour 45
Liberal Democrat 14
Crossbench 6
Non-affiliated 2
Green Party 1

The party breakdowns are our own analysis of the official voting records (recorded votes only; they do not describe the formal whip). How we work this out.

Peers attend divisions ad hoc, so there is no did-not-vote list. Tellers are counted in the Content and Not Content totals, unlike in the Commons.

Tellers: Baroness Anelay of St Johns (Content), Lord Cope of Berkeley (Content), Lord Grocott (Not Content), The Lord McIntosh of Haringey (Not Content).

Every vote

Contents (36)

Not Contents (66)

Tellers (4)

Source: the official Lords division record.