Lords division · 30 Mar 2000 · No. 1

Financial Services and Markets Bill

It was moved by the Lord Kingsland, in Clause 293, page 151, line 43, to leave out subsection (2) and insert: (“( ) The arrangements made by the Authority must provide for the investigator to report to the Authority on the result of his investigation and, if he considers a complaint to be well-founded, to make recommendations to the Authority on the steps (if any) which the recognised body should take to remedy the matter complained of. ( ) If the investigator reports to the Authority that a complaint is well-founded, the Authority may direct the recognised body to take specified steps in response to the investigator’s report. ( ) Specified steps may include the payment by the recognised body of a specified sum or specified sums to a specified person or specified persons. ( ) “Independent” means appearing to the Authority to be independent of the recognised body. ( ) “Specified” means specified by the Authority.”); which being objected to, the question was put thereupon, and the Committee divided:

At a glance The Not Contents won by a margin of 43 votes. The Government's position was Not Content, and it won.

How the parties voted

The party breakdowns are our own analysis of the official voting records (recorded votes only; they do not describe the formal whip). How we work this out.

Peers attend divisions ad hoc, so there is no did-not-vote list. Tellers are counted in the Content and Not Content totals, unlike in the Commons.

Tellers: The Earl of Courtown (Content), Lord Northbrook (Content), Lord Carter (Not Content), The Lord McIntosh of Haringey (Not Content).

Every vote

No members match your search.

Source: the official Lords division record.