Sign in
☰
People MPsHouse of LordsGovernmentOppositionPartiesCommittees Votes Commons votesLords votesVotes by issueTopicsStats & rankingsParliament in numbers Legislation BillsEarly day motionsPetitions Elections Election resultsConstituenciesWho is my MP? Scotland OverviewMSPsScottish GovernmentVotesBillsMotionsCommitteesConstituencies & regionsElections Search Sign in

Lords division · 25 Feb 2003 · No. 4

Crime (International Co-operation) Bill [HL]

It was moved by the Viscount Bridgeman, after Clause 45, to insert the new Clause (Annual report on effects of requests for banking information); which being objected to, the question was put thereupon, and the House divided:

The Not Contents have it

Majority 34

Contents: 23 Not Contents: 57

At a glance The Not Contents won by a margin of 34 votes. The Government's position was Not Content, and it won.

How the parties voted

Contents

Conservative 18
Crossbench 3
Non-affiliated 2

Not Contents

Labour 43
Liberal Democrat 10
Non-affiliated 3
Crossbench 1

The party breakdowns are our own analysis of the official voting records (recorded votes only; they do not describe the formal whip). How we work this out.

Peers attend divisions ad hoc, so there is no did-not-vote list. Tellers are counted in the Content and Not Content totals, unlike in the Commons.

Tellers: Lord Cope of Berkeley (Content), Baroness Seccombe (Content), Lord Grocott (Not Content), The Lord McIntosh of Haringey (Not Content).

Every vote

Contents (21)

Not Contents (55)

Tellers (4)

Source: the official Lords division record.