Sign in
☰
People MPsHouse of LordsGovernmentOppositionPartiesCommittees Votes Commons votesLords votesVotes by issueTopicsStats & rankingsParliament in numbers Legislation BillsEarly day motionsPetitions Elections Election resultsConstituenciesWho is my MP? Scotland OverviewMSPsScottish GovernmentVotesBillsMotionsCommitteesConstituencies & regionsElections Search Sign in

Lords division · 17 Mar 2003 · No. 4

Crime (International Co-operation) Bill [HL]

It was moved by the Baroness Anelay of St Johns, in Clause 82, page 55, line 40, at end to insert: “( ) A foreign police officer or customs officer conducting relevant surveillance in the United Kingdom under this section shall be prohibited from stopping or questioning a person under surveillance.”; which being objected to, the question was put thereupon, and the House divided:

The Contents have it

Majority 5

Contents: 122 Not Contents: 117

At a glance The Contents won by a margin of 5 votes. The Government's position was Not Content, and it lost.

How the parties voted

Contents

Conservative 68
Liberal Democrat 28
Crossbench 19
Non-affiliated 5
Green Party 1
Ulster Unionist Party 1

Not Contents

Labour 107
Crossbench 5
Non-affiliated 5

The party breakdowns are our own analysis of the official voting records (recorded votes only; they do not describe the formal whip). How we work this out.

Peers attend divisions ad hoc, so there is no did-not-vote list. Tellers are counted in the Content and Not Content totals, unlike in the Commons.

Tellers: Lord Cope of Berkeley (Content), Baroness Seccombe (Content), Lord Grocott (Not Content), The Lord McIntosh of Haringey (Not Content).

Every vote

Contents (120)

Not Contents (115)

Tellers (4)

Source: the official Lords division record.