Sign in
☰
People MPsHouse of LordsGovernmentOppositionPartiesCommittees Votes Commons votesLords votesVotes by issueTopicsStats & rankingsParliament in numbers Legislation BillsEarly day motionsPetitions Elections Election resultsConstituenciesWho is my MP? Scotland OverviewMSPsScottish GovernmentVotesBillsMotionsCommitteesConstituencies & regionsElections Search Sign in

Lords division · 18 Apr 2000 · No. 2

Financial Services and Markets Bill

It was moved by the Lord Kingsland, in Clause 119, page 59, line 7, at end to insert—(“or (“(c) in relation to market abuse which satisfies the condition set out in section 115(2)(b) or the condition in section 115(2)(c), he did not anticipate that his behaviour would satisfy that condition.”); which being objected to, the question was put thereupon, and the House divided:

The Not Contents have it

Majority 63

Contents: 18 Not Contents: 81

At a glance The Not Contents won by a margin of 63 votes. The Government's position was Not Content, and it won.

How the parties voted

Contents

Conservative 16
Crossbench 1
Non-affiliated 1

Not Contents

Labour 70
Liberal Democrat 5
Non-affiliated 4
Crossbench 2

The party breakdowns are our own analysis of the official voting records (recorded votes only; they do not describe the formal whip). How we work this out.

Peers attend divisions ad hoc, so there is no did-not-vote list. Tellers are counted in the Content and Not Content totals, unlike in the Commons.

Tellers: Lord Burnham (Content), Lord Henley (Content), Lord Carter (Not Content), The Lord McIntosh of Haringey (Not Content).

Every vote

Contents (16)

Not Contents (79)

Tellers (4)

Source: the official Lords division record.