Lords division · 9 Jul 2003 · No. 3

Water Bill [HL]

It was moved by the Baroness Byford, in Clause 19, page 22, line 6, at end to insert: “( ) A protected right that has been unused for four years shall not cease under subsection (4) above if the licence holder can demonstrate that his pattern of abstraction is or has been over a longer cycle.”; which being objected to, the question was put thereupon, and the House divided:

The Not Contents have it

Majority 33

Contents: 30 Not Contents: 63

At a glance The Not Contents won by a margin of 33 votes. The Government's position was Not Content, and it won.

How the parties voted

Contents

Conservative 19
Liberal Democrat 7
Crossbench 2
Independent Ulster Unionist 1
Non-affiliated 1

Not Contents

Labour 57
Crossbench 3
Non-affiliated 3

The party breakdowns are our own analysis of the official voting records (recorded votes only; they do not describe the formal whip). How we work this out.

Peers attend divisions ad hoc, so there is no did-not-vote list. Tellers are counted in the Content and Not Content totals, unlike in the Commons.

Tellers: Lord Cope of Berkeley (Content), Lord Dixon-Smith (Content), Lord Davies of Oldham (Not Content), Lord Grocott (Not Content).

Every vote

Contents (28)

Not Contents (61)

Tellers (4)

Source: the official Lords division record.