Lords division · 14 Oct 2003 · No. 5
Criminal Justice Bill
It was moved by the Baroness Anelay of St Johns, after Clause 283, to insert the new Clause (Duty of probation officers to consult with magistrates); which being objected to, the question was put thereupon, and the Committee divided:
The Not Contents have it
Majority 2
At a glance The Not Contents won by a margin of 2 votes. The Government's position was Not Content, and it lost. This was not a whipped vote, so no party line applied.
How the parties voted
Contents
| Conservative | 6 |
| Liberal Democrat | 4 |
Not Contents
| Labour | 10 |
| Crossbench | 1 |
| Non-affiliated | 1 |
The party breakdowns are our own analysis of the official voting records (recorded votes only; they do not describe the formal whip). How we work this out.
Peers attend divisions ad hoc, so there is no did-not-vote list. Tellers are counted in the Content and Not Content totals, unlike in the Commons.
Tellers: Viscount Bridgeman (Content), Lord Cope of Berkeley (Content), Lord Bassam of Brighton (Not Content), Lord Grocott (Not Content).
Every vote
No members match your search.
Contents (8)
Baroness Anelay of St JohnsConservative
Earl AttleeConservative
Baroness BlatchConservative
Lord Hodgson of Astley AbbottsConservative
Lord Shutt of GreetlandLiberal Democrat
Lord Thomas of GresfordLiberal Democrat
Lord TordoffLiberal Democrat
Baroness WalmsleyLiberal Democrat
Not Contents (10)
Lord WarnerCrossbench
Baroness AndrewsLabour
Lord Campbell-SavoursLabour
Lord Davies of OldhamLabour
Baroness Farrington of RibbletonLabour
Baroness Gibson of Market RasenLabour
Lord GoldsmithLabour
Baroness Gould of PotternewtonLabour
Baroness Scotland of AsthalLabour
Lord Lea of CrondallNon-affiliated
Tellers (4)
Viscount BridgemanConservative
Lord Cope of BerkeleyConservative
Lord Bassam of BrightonLabour
Lord GrocottLabour
Source: the official Lords division record.