Sign in
☰
People MPsHouse of LordsGovernmentOppositionPartiesCommittees Votes Commons votesLords votesVotes by issueTopicsStats & rankingsParliament in numbers Legislation BillsEarly day motionsPetitions Elections Election resultsConstituenciesWho is my MP? Scotland OverviewMSPsScottish GovernmentVotesBillsMotionsCommitteesConstituencies & regionsElections Search Sign in

Lords division · 22 Oct 2003 · No. 5

Extradition Bill

It was moved by the Baroness Anelay of St Johns, in Clause 2, page 2, line 15, to leave out from “including” to end of line 17 and insert “a description of the circumstances in which the offence was committed, including the time, place and degree of participation in the offence by the requested person, the nature and legal classification of the offence and the applicable statutory provision;”; which being objected to, the question was put thereupon, and the House divided:

The Contents have it

Majority 6

Contents: 112 Not Contents: 106

At a glance The Contents won by a margin of 6 votes. The Government's position was Not Content, and it lost.

How the parties voted

Contents

Conservative 72
Liberal Democrat 24
Crossbench 9
Non-affiliated 4
Independent Labour 1
Green Party 1
Labour 1

Not Contents

Labour 90
Crossbench 12
Non-affiliated 3
Bishops 1

The party breakdowns are our own analysis of the official voting records (recorded votes only; they do not describe the formal whip). How we work this out.

Peers attend divisions ad hoc, so there is no did-not-vote list. Tellers are counted in the Content and Not Content totals, unlike in the Commons.

Tellers: Baroness Seccombe (Content), The Earl of Mar and Kellie (Content), Lord Davies of Oldham (Not Content), Lord Grocott (Not Content).

Every vote

Contents (110)

Not Contents (104)

Tellers (4)

Source: the official Lords division record.