Lords division · 23 Oct 2003 · No. 1

Anti-social Behaviour Bill

It was moved by the Baroness Hamwee, in Clause 13, page 10, line 8, after “or” to insert “serious or repeated”; which being objected to, the question was put thereupon, and the House divided:

The Not Contents have it

Majority 50

Contents: 37 Not Contents: 87

At a glance The Not Contents won by a margin of 50 votes. The Government's position was Not Content, and it won.

How the parties voted

Contents

Liberal Democrat 25
Crossbench 4
Conservative 4
Non-affiliated 3
Green Party 1

Not Contents

Labour 71
Crossbench 11
Non-affiliated 5

The party breakdowns are our own analysis of the official voting records (recorded votes only; they do not describe the formal whip). How we work this out.

Peers attend divisions ad hoc, so there is no did-not-vote list. Tellers are counted in the Content and Not Content totals, unlike in the Commons.

Tellers: Lord Addington (Content), Lord Clement-Jones (Content), Lord Davies of Oldham (Not Content), Lord Grocott (Not Content).

Every vote

Contents (35)

Not Contents (85)

Tellers (4)

Source: the official Lords division record.