Sign in
☰
People MPsHouse of LordsGovernmentOppositionPartiesCommittees Votes Commons votesLords votesVotes by issueTopicsStats & rankingsParliament in numbers Legislation BillsEarly day motionsPetitions Elections Election resultsConstituenciesWho is my MP? Scotland OverviewMSPsScottish GovernmentVotesBillsMotionsCommitteesConstituencies & regionsElections Search Sign in

Lords division · 26 Apr 2004 · No. 5

Planning and Compulsory Purchase Bill

It was moved by the Baroness Hamwee, as an amendment to the motion that the House do not insist on its amendment 45 to which the Commons have disagreed, to leave out “not”; which being objected to, the question was put thereupon, and the House divided:

The Not Contents have it

Majority 27

Contents: 87 Not Contents: 114

At a glance The Not Contents won by a margin of 27 votes. The Government's position was Not Content, and it won.

How the parties voted

Contents

Conservative 43
Liberal Democrat 31
Non-affiliated 6
Crossbench 5
Green Party 1
Independent Labour 1

Not Contents

Labour 100
Crossbench 9
Non-affiliated 5

The party breakdowns are our own analysis of the official voting records (recorded votes only; they do not describe the formal whip). How we work this out.

Peers attend divisions ad hoc, so there is no did-not-vote list. Tellers are counted in the Content and Not Content totals, unlike in the Commons.

Tellers: Baroness Harris of Richmond (Content), Lord Roper (Content), Lord Bassam of Brighton (Not Content), Lord Grocott (Not Content).

Every vote

Contents (85)

Not Contents (112)

Tellers (4)

Source: the official Lords division record.