Lords division · 3 Feb 2005 · No. 1

Disability Discrimination Bill [HL]

It was moved by the Baroness Masham of Ilton, in Clause 2, page 3, line 32, at end to insert: “( ) In the 1995 Act, after section 21(2) there is inserted “(2A) In determining their duty under subsection (2), NHS hospital trusts shall ensure that adequate equipment is available to enable disabled persons to be diagnosed and treated to the same standards as other persons. (2B) When assessing the reasonableness of providing equipment under subsection (2A), NHS hospital trusts must not refuse to provide equipment on the grounds of cost alone, unless those costs are grossly disproportionate.””; which being objected to, the question was put thereupon, and the House divided:

The Not Contents have it

Majority 23

Contents: 80 Not Contents: 103

At a glance The Not Contents won by a margin of 23 votes. The Government's position was Not Content, and it won.

How the parties voted

Contents

Liberal Democrat 30
Conservative 28
Crossbench 15
Non-affiliated 4
Green Party 1
Bishops 1
Independent Ulster Unionist 1

Not Contents

Labour 90
Crossbench 8
Non-affiliated 5

The party breakdowns are our own analysis of the official voting records (recorded votes only; they do not describe the formal whip). How we work this out.

Peers attend divisions ad hoc, so there is no did-not-vote list. Tellers are counted in the Content and Not Content totals, unlike in the Commons.

Tellers: Baroness Masham of Ilton (Content), Baroness Harris of Richmond (Content), Lord Davies of Oldham (Not Content), Lord Grocott (Not Content).

Every vote

Contents (78)

Not Contents (101)

Tellers (4)

Source: the official Lords division record.