Petition · past parliament
Stop companies from sneakily renewing subscription services
Rejected
18 signatures
What the petition asks
I signed up for a £1 trial to the Gourmet Society, and a few months later they took £40 from me.
They said this was in the small print T&C's and that I'd had an email warning. I didn't see this email. They wouldn't allow a refund although I had never used the service.
They said this was in the small print T&C's and that I'd had an email warning. I didn't see this email. They wouldn't allow a refund although I had never used the service.
An spam email or a T&C box ticked some time ago should NOT be considered consent for a company to take what is more than half a day's wages for many people.
It is not right for companies to count on people forgetting/misreading/misunderstanding things as a way to make money.
Companies should require a reply to an email saying 'yes you may renew a subscription' before taking money. Or at least give you the opportunity to cancel (as any high street shop would allow you a refund in 28 days).
It is not right for companies to count on people forgetting/misreading/misunderstanding things as a way to make money.
Companies should require a reply to an email saying 'yes you may renew a subscription' before taking money. Or at least give you the opportunity to cancel (as any high street shop would allow you a refund in 28 days).
Why it was rejected
It was not clear what the petition asked the UK Government or Parliament to do.
You could start a new petition calling on Parliament to change the law, to require companies to provide certain information clearly to customers about their subscription services.
Timeline
| 1 Mar 2016 | Petition opened for signatures |
| 17 Mar 2016 | Rejected by the Petitions Committee |
Key facts
Signatures
18
Status
Rejected
Rejected
17 Mar 2016
Follow this petition
Sign in to get an email when the government responds, a debate is scheduled or held, or the petition closes.
Source: the official petition page. Last checked 15 Jul 2026.