Petition · past parliament
A second EU Referendum, to enable a fully informed decision.
Rejected
16 signatures
What the petition asks
Key claims made before the Referendum are now being proved false.
Under UK consumer legislation, citizens would have redress and a "cooling-off" period if companies had been involved in such flagrant miss-selling. The future of our country demands equivalent safeguards.
Under UK consumer legislation, citizens would have redress and a "cooling-off" period if companies had been involved in such flagrant miss-selling. The future of our country demands equivalent safeguards.
Significantly, "Leave" provided neither a post-Referendum plan nor a Risk assessment.
£350 million a week available for the NHS - FALSE.
Free entry to the Single Market - FALSE.
No risk of the UK breaking up - FALSE
"Taking back control" - FALSE. Impossible when much key UK infrastructure (energy, rail, etc) is foreign-owned. "Leave" made no mention of this.
£350 million a week available for the NHS - FALSE.
Free entry to the Single Market - FALSE.
No risk of the UK breaking up - FALSE
"Taking back control" - FALSE. Impossible when much key UK infrastructure (energy, rail, etc) is foreign-owned. "Leave" made no mention of this.
Why it was rejected
There was already a petition about this issue. Duplicates are rejected so signatures collect in one place.
Timeline
| 27 Jun 2016 | Petition opened for signatures |
| 4 Jul 2016 | Rejected by the Petitions Committee |
Key facts
Signatures
16
Status
Rejected
Rejected
4 Jul 2016
Follow this petition
Sign in to get an email when the government responds, a debate is scheduled or held, or the petition closes.
Source: the official petition page. Last checked 15 Jul 2026.