Petition · past parliament
Protect grouse Moors and grouse shooting
Closed
25,322 signatures
What the petition asks
Grouse moors and grouse shooting are an integral part of moorland management both for the grouse and other native wildlife such as lapwing and curlew it also helps support of local businesses and jobs in the local areas this cannot be banned
Here is a link to the Countryside Alliance website for more information on how grouse moors benefit the environment and the facts behind it:
http://www.countryside-alliance.org/ca-flatcap/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Grouse-Shooting-The-Facts-10-Key-Questions-Answered-July-2016.pdf
http://www.countryside-alliance.org/ca-flatcap/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Grouse-Shooting-The-Facts-10-Key-Questions-Answered-July-2016.pdf
Government response · 10 October 2016
Grouse shooting is a legitimate activity that provides economic benefits, jobs and investment in some of our most remote areas and can offer important benefits for wildlife and habitat conservation.
A report by the UK shooting community (Public & Corporate Economic Consultants report 2014: The Value of Shooting) concludes that the overall environmental and economic impact of game bird shooting is positive; the industry has estimated that £250 million per year is spent on management activities substantially benefiting conservation. For grouse shooting in particular, according to the Moorland Association, estates in England and Wales spent £52.5 million on managing 149 grouse moors for shooting in 2010. Scottish landowners manage a further 150 moors for shooting grouse. The industry also supports 1,520 full time equivalent jobs and is worth £97.7 million across Great Britain.
Grouse shooting takes place in upland areas, which are important for delivering a range of valuable “ecosystem services”, including food and fibre, water regulation, carbon storage, biodiversity and recreational opportunities for health and wellbeing. The Government is committed to helping create a more sustainable future for the English uplands, including by protecting peatlands through measures such as the Peatland Code.
The Government welcomes the proactive approach taken by game keeping organisations to ensure a sustainable, mutually beneficial relationship between shooting and conservation, for example through the British Association for Shooting and Conservation’s green shoots initiative.
The Government recognises the benefits that grouse shooting, and shooting more widely, bring to individuals, the environment and the rural economy. It is for these reasons that the Government believes shooting and other country pursuits such as hunting and fishing should be protected.
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
Grouse shooting takes place in upland areas, which are important for delivering a range of valuable “ecosystem services”, including food and fibre, water regulation, carbon storage, biodiversity and recreational opportunities for health and wellbeing. The Government is committed to helping create a more sustainable future for the English uplands, including by protecting peatlands through measures such as the Peatland Code.
The Government welcomes the proactive approach taken by game keeping organisations to ensure a sustainable, mutually beneficial relationship between shooting and conservation, for example through the British Association for Shooting and Conservation’s green shoots initiative.
The Government recognises the benefits that grouse shooting, and shooting more widely, bring to individuals, the environment and the rural economy. It is for these reasons that the Government believes shooting and other country pursuits such as hunting and fishing should be protected.
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
Debate in Parliament
MPs debated this petition on 31 October 2016.
Timeline
| 15 Aug 2016 | Petition opened for signatures |
| 23 Aug 2016 | Passed 10,000 signatures, requiring a government response |
| 10 Oct 2016 | Government responded |
| 31 Oct 2016 | Debated in Parliament |
| 15 Feb 2017 | Closed to new signatures |
Key facts
Signatures
25,322
Status
Closed
Opened
15 Aug 2016
Closed
15 Feb 2017
Response
10 Oct 2016
Debated
31 Oct 2016
Follow this petition
Sign in to get an email when the government responds, a debate is scheduled or held, or the petition closes.
Source: the official petition page. Last checked 15 Jul 2026.