Petition · past parliament
Consider occupational pension forfeiture for errant Members of Parliament.
Rejected
13 signatures
What the petition asks
MPs, convicted of an offence committed in connection with office or guilty of behaviour likely to be gravely injurious to our interests or liable to lead to serious loss of confidence in our Parliamentary system, should have their occupational pensions partially or completely forfeited.
Many office holders in public service have standards of service imposed on them which carry a wide range of punitive measures in the event of transgression. In particular, the police service and the military hold employees to account to the extent an employee may lose part of, or all off, permanently or temporarily, their occupational pension. The matter of Keith Vaz demonstrates, clearly, that if someone isn't suitable to receive a public wage, why should they receive a full public pension?
Why it was rejected
It asked for something that is not the responsibility of the UK Government or Parliament.
The Government and Parliament don’t have the power to set MPs’ pensions. That power was given by Parliament to the Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority (IPSA) in 2010, so that after 2012 MPs no longer had control over their own pensions.
If you would like to contact IPSA about MPs' pensions, here’s how to contact them:
http://parliamentarystandards.org.uk/About%20Us/Pages/Contact-Us.aspx
If you would like to contact IPSA about MPs' pensions, here’s how to contact them:
http://parliamentarystandards.org.uk/About%20Us/Pages/Contact-Us.aspx
Timeline
| 6 Sep 2016 | Petition opened for signatures |
| 7 Sep 2016 | Rejected by the Petitions Committee |
Key facts
Signatures
13
Status
Rejected
Rejected
7 Sep 2016
Follow this petition
Sign in to get an email when the government responds, a debate is scheduled or held, or the petition closes.
Source: the official petition page. Last checked 15 Jul 2026.