Petition · past parliament
Improve The Pet Microchip System To Help Reunite Missing And Stolen Pets #ScanMe
Rejected
10 signatures
What the petition asks
A microchip is not proof of ownership, we are not owners we are 'keepers' - which only indicates where the pet resides and this favours the finder in an ownership dispute. Database procedures need improvement and the veterinarians must help their customers update microchip registration.
In a civil court action to get a microchipped pet home:
Police Crime Reference Number
Photographs
Purchase receipt
Vet bills
Kennel Club registration
Insurance papers
Proof you have been searching for your pet.
Remember it is still not compulsory for the veterinary profession to scan and cross check microchip registration on a pets 1st visit, it's 'recommended' and 'best practice' but that is not mandatory and we are being duped into thinking that microchips will help trace our pets.
Police Crime Reference Number
Photographs
Purchase receipt
Vet bills
Kennel Club registration
Insurance papers
Proof you have been searching for your pet.
Remember it is still not compulsory for the veterinary profession to scan and cross check microchip registration on a pets 1st visit, it's 'recommended' and 'best practice' but that is not mandatory and we are being duped into thinking that microchips will help trace our pets.
Why it was rejected
There was already a petition about this issue. Duplicates are rejected so signatures collect in one place.
Timeline
| 25 Jan 2019 | Petition opened for signatures |
| 30 Jan 2019 | Rejected by the Petitions Committee |
Key facts
Signatures
10
Status
Rejected
Rejected
30 Jan 2019
Follow this petition
Sign in to get an email when the government responds, a debate is scheduled or held, or the petition closes.
Source: the official petition page. Last checked 15 Jul 2026.