Petition · past parliament
Tighten Security of Government Petitions To Prevent Use of False Identities
Rejected
21 signatures
What the petition asks
Government petitions are influential, but only require a name, postcode and email address. It is proven that a false name and any genuine, but randomly selected postcode will suffice. For instance Basil Brush & SW1A 1AA was accepted. This vulnerability is not in the public interest.
The press simply quote numbers signing a petition. This can influence public opinion and potentially Government policy on major issues. It is open to manipulation by vested interests. This loophole needs to be closed, by, perhaps, calling for more proof of identity.
Why it was rejected
It was not clear what the petition asked the UK Government or Parliament to do.
We already monitor petitions to check for fraudulent activity. We use a number of techniques, automated and manual, to identify and block signatures from bots, disposable email addresses or other sources that show signs of fraudulent activity. We also monitor signing patterns. For security reasons, we don’t tell people when their fraudulent activity has been unsuccessful.
We don’t comment in detail about the security measures, but all petitions are subject to checks as part of due diligence and any concerns investigated. We're therefore not sure exactly what further action you'd like to see.
We don’t comment in detail about the security measures, but all petitions are subject to checks as part of due diligence and any concerns investigated. We're therefore not sure exactly what further action you'd like to see.
Timeline
| 23 Mar 2019 | Petition opened for signatures |
| 10 Apr 2019 | Rejected by the Petitions Committee |
Key facts
Signatures
21
Status
Rejected
Rejected
10 Apr 2019
Follow this petition
Sign in to get an email when the government responds, a debate is scheduled or held, or the petition closes.
Source: the official petition page. Last checked 15 Jul 2026.