Petition · past parliament
Discuss the notion that a no deal Brexit is not the legal default.
Rejected
21 signatures
What the petition asks
Legal experts have argued that, because the UK Parliament has not authorised withdrawal from the EU, we have not decided to withdraw according to our own constitutional requirements. As such, in both British and EU law, we do not exit the EU simply because the Article 50 deadline passes.
https://ukhumanrightsblog.com/2019/03/19/no-deal-brexit-may-be-unlawful-a-view-from-rose-slowe/
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2018/16/section/9/enacted
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2018/16/section/10/enacted
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A12012M050
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2018/16/section/9/enacted
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2018/16/section/10/enacted
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A12012M050
Why it was rejected
It was not clear what the petition asked the UK Government or Parliament to do.
Petitions need to call on the UK Government or Parliament to take a specific action.
We're not sure exactly what you'd like the Government or Parliament to do.
You could start a new petition explaining clearly what you would like the Government or Parliament to do.
Timeline
| 11 Aug 2019 | Petition opened for signatures |
| 21 Aug 2019 | Rejected by the Petitions Committee |
Key facts
Signatures
21
Status
Rejected
Rejected
21 Aug 2019
Follow this petition
Sign in to get an email when the government responds, a debate is scheduled or held, or the petition closes.
Source: the official petition page. Last checked 15 Jul 2026.