Petition · past parliament
Supreme Court Justices declare impartiality in Cases/Subjects they are hearing.
Rejected
21 signatures
What the petition asks
In the recent Supreme Court Ruling in R (on the application of Miller) (Appellant) v The Prime Minister (Respondent) the case was heard by all 11 Justices of the Supreme Court. Not one of them declared any interests in the EU.
Interests include receiving any monies, Grants/Payments/Pensions
Interests include receiving any monies, Grants/Payments/Pensions
Their Justices should have been aware that the British public would be likely to see this as Brexit related. Not one of the Justices declared a personal interest in the case such as owning property in the EU, either outright or under a trust or other agreement or employing EU staff at a payment rate below the National Minimum Wage or in receipt now or in the past of EU grants or payments or a pension either in payment or due at a later date.
A declaration of interest must be sought immediately
A declaration of interest must be sought immediately
Why it was rejected
It asked for something that is not the responsibility of the UK Government or Parliament.
The Supreme Court, which is independent of the UK Government and Parliament, has a code of conduct for its Justices. This includes conduct related to Judicial independence and impartiality. You can find out more here, including about how to make a complaint to the Supreme Court:
https://www.supremecourt.uk/about/judicial-conduct-and-complaints.html#01
https://www.supremecourt.uk/about/judicial-conduct-and-complaints.html#01
Timeline
| 25 Sep 2019 | Petition opened for signatures |
| 1 Oct 2019 | Rejected by the Petitions Committee |
Key facts
Signatures
21
Status
Rejected
Rejected
1 Oct 2019
Follow this petition
Sign in to get an email when the government responds, a debate is scheduled or held, or the petition closes.
Source: the official petition page. Last checked 15 Jul 2026.