Petition · past parliament

MPs should not use provocative, incendiary and divisive language.

Rejected 21 signatures

What the petition asks

The field of Critical Discourse Analysis helps us understand the affect of language on society and psychology. The current government are guilty of using vile ideology laden rhetoric which provokes anger in their followers and could potentially lead to violence and tragedy as it has in the past.
Fairclough, N. 1989. Language and Power. New York: Longman.

Halliday, M.A.K., & Matthiessen, C. 2004. An Introduction to Functional Grammar (3rd ed.). London: Arnold.

Hart, C. 2914. Discourse, Grammar and Ideology: Functional and Cognitive Perspectives. London: Bloomsbury.

Thompson, G. 2004. Introducing Functional Grammar (2nd ed.). London: Hodder Education.

van Dijk, T.A. 1998. Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach. London: Sage

Why it was rejected

It was not clear what the petition asked the UK Government or Parliament to do.

Petitions need to call on the UK Government or Parliament to take a specific action.

We're not sure exactly what you'd like the Government or Parliament to do.

You could start a new petition explaining clearly what you would like the Government or Parliament to do.

Timeline

26 Sep 2019 Petition opened for signatures
1 Oct 2019 Rejected by the Petitions Committee

Key facts

Signatures 21
Status Rejected
Rejected 1 Oct 2019

Follow this petition

Sign in to get an email when the government responds, a debate is scheduled or held, or the petition closes.

Source: the official petition page. Last checked 15 Jul 2026.