Sign in
☰
People MPsHouse of LordsGovernmentOppositionPartiesCommittees Votes Commons votesLords votesVotes by issueTopicsStats & rankingsParliament in numbers Legislation BillsEarly day motionsPetitions Elections Election resultsConstituenciesWho is my MP? Scotland OverviewMSPsScottish GovernmentVotesBillsMotionsCommitteesConstituencies & regionsElections Search Sign in

Lords division · 26 Jan 2009 · No. 1

Banking Bill

Baroness Noakes moved amendment 160, in clause 167, page 89, line 3, at end to insert: “214AA Contingency funding: power to make regulations The Treasury may make regulations under section 214A only after it has laid before Parliament a report on the impact of a pre-funded scheme on the classes of person from whom contributions can be levied and whether contingency funding is the best way to achieve the special resolution regime objectives set out in section 4 of the Banking Act 2008.” The Committee divided:

The Not Contents have it

Majority 94

Contents: 80 Not Contents: 174

At a glance The Not Contents won by a margin of 94 votes. The Government's position was Not Content, and it won.

How the parties voted

Contents

Conservative 63
Crossbench 12
Non-affiliated 4
Liberal Democrat 1

Not Contents

Labour 104
Liberal Democrat 32
Crossbench 30
Non-affiliated 8

The party breakdowns are our own analysis of the official voting records (recorded votes only; they do not describe the formal whip). How we work this out.

Peers attend divisions ad hoc, so there is no did-not-vote list. Tellers are counted in the Content and Not Content totals, unlike in the Commons.

Tellers: Baroness Anelay of St Johns (Content), Lord Bates (Content), Lord Bassam of Brighton (Not Content), Lord Davies of Oldham (Not Content).

Every vote

Contents (78)

Not Contents (172)

Tellers (4)

Source: the official Lords division record.