Lords division · 23 Nov 2000 · No. 1

Countryside and Rights of Way Bill

It was moved by the Earl Peel, in Clause 2, page 3, line 15, at end to insert: (“( ) Where on any day a person fails to comply with Schedule 2 or any restriction imposed under Chapter II, and, having been advised by the owner or by a person acting on his authority on two or more different occasions on the same day, on land in the same ownership, of the effect of that failure to comply, he again fails on the same day, on land in the same ownership, to comply with Schedule 2 or any restriction imposed under Chapter II, he shall be guilty of an offence and liable, on summary conviction, to a fine not exceeding level 1 on the standard scale.”); which being objected to, the question was put thereupon, and the House divided:

The Not Contents have it

Majority 89

Contents: 98 Not Contents: 187

At a glance The Not Contents won by a margin of 89 votes. The Government's position was Not Content, and it won.

How the parties voted

Contents

Conservative 72
Crossbench 19
Non-affiliated 5
Bishops 1
Green Party 1

Not Contents

Labour 116
Liberal Democrat 44
Non-affiliated 15
Crossbench 10
Conservative 1
Independent Socialist 1

The party breakdowns are our own analysis of the official voting records (recorded votes only; they do not describe the formal whip). How we work this out.

Peers attend divisions ad hoc, so there is no did-not-vote list. Tellers are counted in the Content and Not Content totals, unlike in the Commons.

Tellers: Earl of Northesk (Content), Earl Peel (Content), Lord Carter (Not Content), The Lord McIntosh of Haringey (Not Content).

Every vote

Contents (96)

Not Contents (185)

Tellers (4)

Source: the official Lords division record.