Sign in
☰
People MPsHouse of LordsGovernmentOppositionPartiesCommittees Votes Commons votesLords votesVotes by issueTopicsStats & rankingsParliament in numbers Legislation BillsEarly day motionsPetitions Elections Election resultsConstituenciesWho is my MP? Scotland OverviewMSPsScottish GovernmentVotesBillsMotionsCommitteesConstituencies & regionsElections Search Sign in

Lords division · 20 Mar 2001 · No. 2

International Criminal Court Bill [HL]

It was moved by the Lord Howell of Guildford, in Clause 65, page 32, line 30, leave out from (“or”) to (“that”) in line 31 and to insert: (“wantonly or recklessly disregarded information that clearly indicated,”); which being objected to, the question was put thereupon, and the House divided:

The Not Contents have it

Majority 64

Contents: 105 Not Contents: 169

At a glance The Not Contents won by a margin of 64 votes. The Government's position was Not Content, and it won.

How the parties voted

Contents

Conservative 90
Crossbench 11
Non-affiliated 3
Labour 1

Not Contents

Labour 108
Liberal Democrat 41
Non-affiliated 9
Crossbench 7
Bishops 2
Independent Labour 1
Conservative 1

The party breakdowns are our own analysis of the official voting records (recorded votes only; they do not describe the formal whip). How we work this out.

Peers attend divisions ad hoc, so there is no did-not-vote list. Tellers are counted in the Content and Not Content totals, unlike in the Commons.

Tellers: Lord Burnham (Content), Lord Henley (Content), Lord Carter (Not Content), The Lord McIntosh of Haringey (Not Content).

Every vote

Contents (103)

Not Contents (167)

Tellers (4)

Source: the official Lords division record.