Sign in
☰
People MPsHouse of LordsGovernmentOppositionPartiesCommittees Votes Commons votesLords votesVotes by issueTopicsStats & rankingsParliament in numbers Legislation BillsEarly day motionsPetitions Elections Election resultsConstituenciesWho is my MP? Scotland OverviewMSPsScottish GovernmentVotesBillsMotionsCommitteesConstituencies & regionsElections Search Sign in

Lords division · 25 Jul 2002 · No. 1

Animal Health Bill

It was moved by the Duke of Montrose, in Schedule 2, page 15, line 4, at end to insert: “( ) the Ministry must, at the same time, publish their reasons and the scientific evidence behind the making of the order. which being objected to, the question was put thereupon, and the Committee divided:

The Not Contents have it

Majority 15

Contents: 59 Not Contents: 74

At a glance The Not Contents won by a margin of 15 votes. The Government's position was Not Content, and it won.

How the parties voted

Contents

Conservative 33
Liberal Democrat 16
Crossbench 5
Non-affiliated 4
Bishops 1

Not Contents

Labour 67
Crossbench 4
Non-affiliated 3

The party breakdowns are our own analysis of the official voting records (recorded votes only; they do not describe the formal whip). How we work this out.

Peers attend divisions ad hoc, so there is no did-not-vote list. Tellers are counted in the Content and Not Content totals, unlike in the Commons.

Tellers: The Duke of Montrose (Content), Baroness Seccombe (Content), Lord Grocott (Not Content), The Lord McIntosh of Haringey (Not Content).

Every vote

Contents (57)

Not Contents (72)

Tellers (4)

Source: the official Lords division record.