Sign in
☰
People MPsHouse of LordsGovernmentOppositionPartiesCommittees Votes Commons votesLords votesVotes by issueTopicsStats & rankingsParliament in numbers Legislation BillsEarly day motionsPetitions Elections Election resultsConstituenciesWho is my MP? Scotland OverviewMSPsScottish GovernmentVotesBillsMotionsCommitteesConstituencies & regionsElections Search Sign in

Lords division · 19 Nov 2003 · No. 5

Health and Social Care (Community Health and Standards) Bill

It was moved by the Earl Howe, as an amendment to the motion that the House do not insist on its amendment 1 to which the Commons have disagreed for their Reason 1A, to leave out “not”; which being objected to, the question was put thereupon, and the House divided:

The Contents have it

Majority 68

Contents: 169 Not Contents: 101

At a glance The Contents won by a margin of 68 votes. The Government's position was Not Content, and it lost.

How the parties voted

Contents

Conservative 95
Liberal Democrat 44
Crossbench 15
Non-affiliated 8
Bishops 3
Labour 1
Ulster Unionist Party 1
Independent Labour 1
Lord Speaker 1

Not Contents

Labour 86
Crossbench 11
Non-affiliated 4

The party breakdowns are our own analysis of the official voting records (recorded votes only; they do not describe the formal whip). How we work this out.

Peers attend divisions ad hoc, so there is no did-not-vote list. Tellers are counted in the Content and Not Content totals, unlike in the Commons.

Tellers: Lord Cope of Berkeley (Content), Baroness Barker (Content), Lord Davies of Oldham (Not Content), Baroness Farrington of Ribbleton (Not Content).

Every vote

Contents (167)

Not Contents (99)

Tellers (4)

Source: the official Lords division record.