Sign in
☰
People MPsHouse of LordsGovernmentOppositionPartiesCommittees Votes Commons votesLords votesVotes by issueTopicsStats & rankingsParliament in numbers Legislation BillsEarly day motionsPetitions Elections Election resultsConstituenciesWho is my MP? Scotland OverviewMSPsScottish GovernmentVotesBillsMotionsCommitteesConstituencies & regionsElections Search Sign in

Lords division · 1 Mar 2004 · No. 2

Planning and Compulsory Purchase Bill

It was moved by the Baroness Hamwee, in Clause 38, page 20, line 28, at end to insert: “( ) For the purposes of any area in Greater London, the development plan prior to the publication by the Mayor of London of a new spatial development strategy in accordance with section 341(1)(b) of the Greater London Authority Act 1999 (c. 29) (alteration or replacement) is the unitary development plan adopted in accordance with the principal Act.”; which being objected to, the question was put thereupon, and the House divided:

The Contents have it

Majority 6

Contents: 137 Not Contents: 131

At a glance The Contents won by a margin of 6 votes. The Government's position was Not Content, and it lost.

How the parties voted

Contents

Conservative 85
Liberal Democrat 33
Crossbench 10
Non-affiliated 5
Conservative Independent 1
Green Party 1
Independent Labour 1
Lord Speaker 1

Not Contents

Labour 107
Crossbench 18
Non-affiliated 6

The party breakdowns are our own analysis of the official voting records (recorded votes only; they do not describe the formal whip). How we work this out.

Peers attend divisions ad hoc, so there is no did-not-vote list. Tellers are counted in the Content and Not Content totals, unlike in the Commons.

Tellers: Lord Addington (Content), Baroness Maddock (Content), Baroness Farrington of Ribbleton (Not Content), Lord Grocott (Not Content).

Every vote

Contents (135)

Not Contents (129)

Tellers (4)

Source: the official Lords division record.