Lords division · 11 Mar 2004 · No. 1

Anti-terrorism, Crime and Security Act 2001 (Continuance in Force of Sections 21 to 23) Order 2004

It was moved by the Lord Holme of Cheltenham, as an amendment to the motion that the draft Order be approved, at end to insert “but this House calls on Her Majesty’s Government to replace Part 4 of the Anti-terrorism, Crime and Security Act 2001 with alternative provisions which do not require derogation from the European Convention on Human Rights”; which being objected to, the question was put thereupon, and the House divided:

The Not Contents have it

Majority 62

Contents: 44 Not Contents: 106

At a glance The Not Contents won by a margin of 62 votes. The Government's position was Not Content, and it won.

How the parties voted

Contents

Liberal Democrat 28
Non-affiliated 5
Labour 5
Crossbench 4
Bishops 1
Conservative 1

Not Contents

Labour 70
Crossbench 19
Conservative 12
Non-affiliated 5

The party breakdowns are our own analysis of the official voting records (recorded votes only; they do not describe the formal whip). How we work this out.

Peers attend divisions ad hoc, so there is no did-not-vote list. Tellers are counted in the Content and Not Content totals, unlike in the Commons.

Tellers: Lord Addington (Content), Lord Roper (Content), Lord Davies of Oldham (Not Content), Lord Grocott (Not Content).

Every vote

Contents (42)

Not Contents (104)

Tellers (4)

Source: the official Lords division record.