Lords division · 28 Feb 2000 · No. 1

Local Government Bill [HL]

It was moved by the Lord Dixon-Smith, in Clause 3, page 2, line 30, to leave out subsection (2) and insert: (“( ) A local authority, in considering expenditure relating to section 2(1), may only spend money, whether raised by precept, borrowing or otherwise, up to a sum limited in any one year by the amount that would be raised if the level of the Council Tax precept on a Band D house within its area were increased by £2.”); which being objected to, the question was put thereupon, and the House divided:

The Not Contents have it

Majority 69

Contents: 66 Not Contents: 135

At a glance The Not Contents won by a margin of 69 votes. The Government's position was Not Content, and it won.

How the parties voted

Contents

Conservative 55
Crossbench 8
Non-affiliated 2
Green Party 1

Not Contents

Labour 97
Liberal Democrat 16
Crossbench 10
Non-affiliated 9
Bishops 2
Independent Labour 1

The party breakdowns are our own analysis of the official voting records (recorded votes only; they do not describe the formal whip). How we work this out.

Peers attend divisions ad hoc, so there is no did-not-vote list. Tellers are counted in the Content and Not Content totals, unlike in the Commons.

Tellers: Lord Burnham (Content), Lord Henley (Content), Lord Carter (Not Content), The Lord McIntosh of Haringey (Not Content).

Every vote

Contents (64)

Not Contents (133)

Tellers (4)

Source: the official Lords division record.