Sign in
☰
People MPsHouse of LordsGovernmentOppositionPartiesCommittees Votes Commons votesLords votesVotes by issueTopicsStats & rankingsParliament in numbers Legislation BillsEarly day motionsPetitions Elections Election resultsConstituenciesWho is my MP? Scotland OverviewMSPsScottish GovernmentVotesBillsMotionsCommitteesConstituencies & regionsElections Search Sign in

Lords division · 1 Mar 2001 · No. 2

Special Educational Needs and Disibility Bill [HL]

It was moved by the Baroness Blatch, in Clause 1, page 2, to leave out lines 9 and 10; which being objected to, the question was put thereupon, and the House divided:

The Not Contents have it

Majority 32

Contents: 93 Not Contents: 125

At a glance The Not Contents won by a margin of 32 votes. The Government's position was Not Content, and it won.

How the parties voted

Contents

Conservative 86
Crossbench 5
Green Party 1
Non-affiliated 1

Not Contents

Labour 85
Liberal Democrat 24
Crossbench 8
Non-affiliated 7
Conservative 1

The party breakdowns are our own analysis of the official voting records (recorded votes only; they do not describe the formal whip). How we work this out.

Peers attend divisions ad hoc, so there is no did-not-vote list. Tellers are counted in the Content and Not Content totals, unlike in the Commons.

Tellers: Lord Burnham (Content), Lord Henley (Content), Lord Carter (Not Content), Lord Davies of Oldham (Not Content).

Every vote

Contents (91)

Not Contents (123)

Tellers (4)

Source: the official Lords division record.