Lords division · 28 Apr 2003 · No. 2

Regional Assemblies (Preparations) Bill

It was moved by the Baroness Hanham, in Clause 17, page 12, line 5, at end to insert: “( ) in any such referendum, the proportion of those actually voting for the proposition is equal to, or greater than, the proportion given in Schedule (Proportion of electors required to secure a majority) for the relevant percentage of the eligible electorate certified as having voted,”; which being objected to, the question was put thereupon, and the House divided:

The Not Contents have it

Majority 13

Contents: 137 Not Contents: 150

At a glance The Not Contents won by a margin of 13 votes. The Government's position was Not Content, and it won.

How the parties voted

Contents

Conservative 110
Crossbench 19
Non-affiliated 3
Bishops 2
Lord Speaker 1
Labour 1
Independent Labour 1

Not Contents

Labour 104
Liberal Democrat 32
Crossbench 7
Non-affiliated 7

The party breakdowns are our own analysis of the official voting records (recorded votes only; they do not describe the formal whip). How we work this out.

Peers attend divisions ad hoc, so there is no did-not-vote list. Tellers are counted in the Content and Not Content totals, unlike in the Commons.

Tellers: Lord Cope of Berkeley (Content), Baroness Seccombe (Content), Lord Grocott (Not Content), The Lord McIntosh of Haringey (Not Content).

Every vote

Contents (135)

Not Contents (148)

Tellers (4)

Source: the official Lords division record.