Sign in
☰
People MPsHouse of LordsGovernmentOppositionPartiesCommittees Votes Commons votesLords votesVotes by issueTopicsStats & rankingsParliament in numbers Legislation BillsEarly day motionsPetitions Elections Election resultsConstituenciesWho is my MP? Scotland OverviewMSPsScottish GovernmentVotesBillsMotionsCommitteesConstituencies & regionsElections Search Sign in

Lords division · 19 Jun 2003 · No. 2

Licensing Bill [HL]

It was moved by the Baroness Buscombe, as an amendment to the motion that the House do agree with the Commons in their Amendment No. 62, to leave out from “that” to the end and insert “the House do disagree with the Commons in their amendment but do propose amendment 62A in lieu thereof; which being objected to, the question was put thereupon, and the House divided:

The Contents have it

Majority 15

Contents: 128 Not Contents: 113

At a glance The Contents won by a margin of 15 votes. The Government's position was Not Content, and it lost.

How the parties voted

Contents

Conservative 73
Liberal Democrat 30
Crossbench 20
Non-affiliated 4
Green Party 1

Not Contents

Labour 94
Crossbench 9
Non-affiliated 8
Liberal Democrat 1
Conservative 1

The party breakdowns are our own analysis of the official voting records (recorded votes only; they do not describe the formal whip). How we work this out.

Peers attend divisions ad hoc, so there is no did-not-vote list. Tellers are counted in the Content and Not Content totals, unlike in the Commons.

Tellers: Lord Cope of Berkeley (Content), Baroness Seccombe (Content), Lord Davies of Oldham (Not Content), Lord Grocott (Not Content).

Every vote

Contents (126)

Not Contents (111)

Tellers (4)

Source: the official Lords division record.