Sign in
☰
People MPsHouse of LordsGovernmentOppositionPartiesCommittees Votes Commons votesLords votesVotes by issueTopicsStats & rankingsParliament in numbers Legislation BillsEarly day motionsPetitions Elections Election resultsConstituenciesWho is my MP? Scotland OverviewMSPsScottish GovernmentVotesBillsMotionsCommitteesConstituencies & regionsElections Search Sign in

Lords division · 18 May 2000 · No. 2

Financial Services and Markets Bill

It was moved by the Lord McIntosh of Haringey, after Clause 115, to insert the new Clause (Provisions included in the Authority’s code by reference to the City Code); which being objected to, the question was put thereupon, and the House divided:

The Not Contents have it

Majority 49

Contents: 118 Not Contents: 167

At a glance The Not Contents won by a margin of 49 votes. The Government's position was Content, and it lost.

How the parties voted

Contents

Labour 97
Crossbench 14
Non-affiliated 5
Independent Labour 1
Conservative 1

Not Contents

Conservative 123
Liberal Democrat 24
Crossbench 9
Non-affiliated 9
Conservative Independent 1
Lord Speaker 1

The party breakdowns are our own analysis of the official voting records (recorded votes only; they do not describe the formal whip). How we work this out.

Peers attend divisions ad hoc, so there is no did-not-vote list. Tellers are counted in the Content and Not Content totals, unlike in the Commons.

Tellers: Lord Carter (Content), Lord Haskel (Content), Lord Burnham (Not Content), Lord Henley (Not Content).

Every vote

Contents (116)

Not Contents (165)

Tellers (4)

Source: the official Lords division record.