Lords division · 3 Nov 2003 · No. 3

Anti-social Behaviour Bill

It was moved by the Earl of Shrewsbury, in Clause 45, page 38, line 17, at end to insert: “(7) After section 1(5) of the Firearms (Amendment) Act 1988 (c. 45) (prohibited weapons and ammunition) insert— “(6) Where an order under subsection (4) may result in a person who has lawfully owned any firearm or ammunition subject to the order being deprived of his property (whether or not a form of licence may be made available) the Secretary of State shall make a draft compensation scheme. (7) The scheme in subsection (6) shall be laid before both Houses of Parliament as an order at the same time as the order under subsection (4) is laid, and shall be approved in draft by each House of Parliament.””; which being objected to, the question was put thereupon, and the House divided:

The Not Contents have it

Majority 11

Contents: 102 Not Contents: 113

At a glance The Not Contents won by a margin of 11 votes. The Government's position was Not Content, and it won.

How the parties voted

Contents

Conservative 68
Liberal Democrat 17
Crossbench 12
Non-affiliated 4
Green Party 1

Not Contents

Labour 101
Crossbench 7
Non-affiliated 5

The party breakdowns are our own analysis of the official voting records (recorded votes only; they do not describe the formal whip). How we work this out.

Peers attend divisions ad hoc, so there is no did-not-vote list. Tellers are counted in the Content and Not Content totals, unlike in the Commons.

Tellers: Earl Attlee (Content), Baroness Seccombe (Content), Lord Davies of Oldham (Not Content), Lord Grocott (Not Content).

Every vote

Contents (100)

Not Contents (111)

Tellers (4)

Source: the official Lords division record.