Sign in
☰
People MPsHouse of LordsGovernmentOppositionPartiesCommittees Votes Commons votesLords votesVotes by issueTopicsStats & rankingsParliament in numbers Legislation BillsEarly day motionsPetitions Elections Election resultsConstituenciesWho is my MP? Scotland OverviewMSPsScottish GovernmentVotesBillsMotionsCommitteesConstituencies & regionsElections Search Sign in

Lords division · 26 Apr 2004 · No. 3

Planning and Compulsory Purchase Bill

It was moved by the Baroness Hamwee, as an amendment to the motion that the House do not insist on its amendments 4 and 5 en bloc to which the Commons have disagreed, to leave out “not”; which being objected to, the question was put thereupon, and the House divided:

The Not Contents have it

Majority 13

Contents: 105 Not Contents: 118

At a glance The Not Contents won by a margin of 13 votes. The Government's position was Not Content, and it won.

How the parties voted

Contents

Conservative 52
Liberal Democrat 32
Crossbench 15
Non-affiliated 5
Green Party 1

Not Contents

Labour 102
Crossbench 13
Non-affiliated 2
Independent Socialist 1

The party breakdowns are our own analysis of the official voting records (recorded votes only; they do not describe the formal whip). How we work this out.

Peers attend divisions ad hoc, so there is no did-not-vote list. Tellers are counted in the Content and Not Content totals, unlike in the Commons.

Tellers: Lord Dholakia (Content), Baroness Maddock (Content), Lord Grocott (Not Content), Lord Triesman (Not Content).

Every vote

Contents (103)

Not Contents (116)

Tellers (4)

Source: the official Lords division record.