Lords division · 3 Nov 2004 · No. 1

Housing Bill

It was moved by the Baroness Maddock, in Clause 55, page 37, line 17, at end to insert: “( ) In exercising the power conferred by subsection (3), the appropriate national authority must ensure that the following fall within the prescribed description of HMOs for the purposes of subsection (2)(a)— (a) upon such an order coming into force, HMOs of 3 or more storeys and occupied by 5 or more persons; (b) within one year of such an order coming into force, HMOs of 3 or more storeys and occupied by 4 or more persons; and (c) within 2 years of such an order coming into force, HMOs of 3 or more storeys and occupied by 3 or more persons.”; which being objected to, the question was put thereupon, and the House divided:

The Not Contents have it

Majority 19

Contents: 111 Not Contents: 130

At a glance The Not Contents won by a margin of 19 votes. The Government's position was Not Content, and it won.

How the parties voted

Contents

Conservative 50
Liberal Democrat 39
Crossbench 17
Non-affiliated 3
Conservative Independent 1
Independent Labour 1

Not Contents

Labour 108
Crossbench 15
Non-affiliated 5
Ulster Unionist Party 1
Independent Socialist 1

The party breakdowns are our own analysis of the official voting records (recorded votes only; they do not describe the formal whip). How we work this out.

Peers attend divisions ad hoc, so there is no did-not-vote list. Tellers are counted in the Content and Not Content totals, unlike in the Commons.

Tellers: Baroness Maddock (Content), Lord Shutt of Greetland (Content), Lord Davies of Oldham (Not Content), Lord Grocott (Not Content).

Every vote

Contents (109)

Not Contents (128)

Tellers (4)

Source: the official Lords division record.