Sign in
☰
People MPsHouse of LordsGovernmentOppositionPartiesCommittees Votes Commons votesLords votesVotes by issueTopicsStats & rankingsParliament in numbers Legislation BillsEarly day motionsPetitions Elections Election resultsConstituenciesWho is my MP? Scotland OverviewMSPsScottish GovernmentVotesBillsMotionsCommitteesConstituencies & regionsElections Search Sign in

Lords division · 26 Mar 2001 · No. 3

Hunting Bill

It was moved by the Lord Falcolner of Thoroton to leave out Clause 1 and insert the following new Clause:Hunting with Dogs: Regulation; which being objected to, the question was put thereupon, and the Committee divided:

The Not Contents have it

Majority 81

Contents: 122 Not Contents: 203

At a glance The Not Contents won by a margin of 81 votes. The Government's position was Not Content, and it lost. This was not a whipped vote, so no party line applied.

How the parties voted

Contents

Labour 39
Crossbench 29
Liberal Democrat 26
Conservative 13
Non-affiliated 10
Bishops 4
Green Party 1

Not Contents

Conservative 113
Crossbench 38
Labour 37
Non-affiliated 7
Liberal Democrat 6
Independent Labour 1
Ulster Unionist Party 1

The party breakdowns are our own analysis of the official voting records (recorded votes only; they do not describe the formal whip). How we work this out.

Peers attend divisions ad hoc, so there is no did-not-vote list. Tellers are counted in the Content and Not Content totals, unlike in the Commons.

Tellers: Viscount Allenby of Megiddo (Content), Viscount Bledisloe (Content), Lord Graham of Edmonton (Not Content), Lord McNally (Not Content).

Every vote

Contents (120)

Not Contents (201)

Tellers (4)

Source: the official Lords division record.