Lords division · 19 Mar 2002 · No. 2

Hunting with Dogs

It was moved by the Baroness Farrington of Ribbleton, on behalf of the Lord Whitty, to resolve that this House considers that the hunting of wild mammals with dogs should be required to be regulated in accordance with arrangements similar to those set out in Schedule 2 to the Hunting Bill as introduced into the Commons in session 2000–01 [Bill 2] (Hunting under licence); which being objected to, the question was put thereupon, and the House divided:

The Contents have it

Majority 307

Contents: 366 Not Contents: 59

At a glance The Contents won by a margin of 307 votes. The Government's position was Not Content, and it lost. This was not a whipped vote, so no party line applied.

How the parties voted

Contents

Conservative 158
Crossbench 90
Labour 61
Liberal Democrat 32
Non-affiliated 14
Bishops 6
Green Party 1
Conservative Independent 1
Ulster Unionist Party 1
Lord Speaker 1

Not Contents

Labour 49
Liberal Democrat 7
Crossbench 1
Conservative 1
Non-affiliated 1

The party breakdowns are our own analysis of the official voting records (recorded votes only; they do not describe the formal whip). How we work this out.

Peers attend divisions ad hoc, so there is no did-not-vote list. Tellers are counted in the Content and Not Content totals, unlike in the Commons.

Tellers: Lord Donoughue (Content), Baroness Golding (Content), Lord Graham of Edmonton (Not Content), Lord McNally (Not Content).

Every vote

Contents (363)

Not Contents (57)

Tellers (4)

Source: the official Lords division record.